Most Illegal Immigrant Families Collect Welfare

From Judicial Watch

Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their American-born anchor babies.

Even before the recession, immigrant households with children used welfare programs at consistently higher rates than natives, according to the extensive census data collected and analyzed by a nonpartisan Washington D.C. group dedicated to researching legal and illegal immigration in the U.S. The results, published this month in a lengthy report, are hardly surprising.
http://cis.org/immigrant-welfare-use-2011

Basically, the majority of households across the country benefitting from publicly-funded welfare programs are headed by immigrants, both legal and illegal. States where immigrant households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%), Texas, California and New York with 61% each and Pennsylvania (59%).

The study focused on eight major welfare programs that cost the government $517 billion the year they were examined. They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional program known as Women, Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced school lunch, public housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).

Food assistance and Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal immigrants, mainly on behalf of their American-born children who get automatic citizenship. On the other hand, legal immigrant households take advantage of every available welfare program, according to the study, which attributes it to low education level and resulting low income.

The highest rate of welfare recipients come from the Dominican Republic (82 %), Mexico and Guatemala (75%) and Ecuador (70%), according to the report, which says welfare use tends to be high for both new arrivals and established residents.  

Iowa Terror Drill Focuses On White Supremacists Killing Immigrants

I remember drills and training for disasters and events growing up and in the military. What I do not remember is having a theme like they are having for an upcoming drill in Pottawattamie County Iowa this weekend at Treynor High School.

The scenario

The exercise scenario describes shootings occurring after rising tensions in the community because of an influx of minorities, Reed said. The newcomers, some who are American citizens and some who are illegal immigrants, were to have moved into a rural area from urban areas in search of more-affordable living. The newcomers are not welcomed by racial extremists, and controversy sweeps the community, he said.

I do not understand the reason even to have a scenario except to incite controversy and problems in their community. If you need a scenario how about this one; there was a shooting at a school. No problems and much easier to explain to people.

But no, the coordinator of this drill even came up with this

One of the fictional suspects involved in the shootings is described an 18-year-old white male with a quick-tempered father who is a firearms enthusiast with ties to an underground white supremacy group. A second fictional suspect is described as an isolated 17-year-old white male student who was befriended by the older student and who mimics his new friend.

"This is purely the backdrop and the setup, if you will, to help create a perception of reality for the responders," Reed said.

The exercise is intended to help improve the emergency response effort in Pottawattamie County to a crisis situation in the public schools.

Now allow me to put another piece of information here for you to consider.
Treynor, population is 919

How many responders do they have?

They also are using my federal tax dollars to incite hatred and portray White Americans as killers and illegal immigrants as the victims.

Read more here

Dirty Immigration Prosecutor Gets 17 Year Sentence

Kind of a shame that this man didn't receive the full 30 year sentence that prosecutors were asking for. Yes, defense can cry boo-hoo and claim the sentence is harsher than what some murderers get but that is comparing apples to oranges and one has nothing to do with the other. This dirty prosecutor - this officer of the court, paid to represent we the people - assisted in bringing an untold number of illegal criminals into this country to live off our system, to pose a threat to who knows how many cities and communities - we will likely never know the total damage this greedy bastard caused us. So yes, I say again, it's a damn shame that he was not sentenced to the maximum extent of the law and forced to trade 30 years of his existence in exchange for the crimes he committed against America and We The People...

By John North, KABC Los Angeles - 

There was a sentencing Monday, for a once-prominent attorney for immigration and customs enforcement.

He was convicted of taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes from the very people he was supposed to be prosecuting.

Constantine Kallas was a federal immigration attorney, a prosecutor. Casino surveillance video showed him about to get a $20,000 bribe to get a green card for an illegal immigrant. Kallas was convicted for this bribe and 35 other federal crimes.

Prosecutors believe Kallas received $950,000 in cash bribes over five years. In federal court Monday he was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison.

"He essentially engaged in a conspiracy as a prosecutor to engage in criminal acts with the people he was charged to prosecute," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Raymond Aghaian.

Kallas' attorney Dean Steward said the sentence was too stiff; he argued for seven years. Prosecutors wanted 30 years.

Full Story

The uncontrollable chaos of immigration and multiculturalism

As America grapples with its black/white conundrum daily on various outbursts across the nation, the latest being Juan Williams at NPR, or the latest implosion at NPR with racial slurs--we face even greater dilemmas as we create four new ethnic tribal dynamics via relentless immigration. What four you ask? As we immigrate millions of legal and illegal immigrants from Arabic and Spanish cultures—we now have four major tribes competing for dominance within the United States.

As different tribes grow in numbers, they manifest their power as to voting and cultural dominances. Few understand what has happened to France, United Kingdom, Holland, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Italy, German, Australia and Spain—but it’s headed into America at breakneck speed.

With the Spanish tribe, you see a century old ‘hurt’ in the form of, “They stole Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California from us.” From the African tribe, you hear, “We suffered racism and destruction of our culture. It’s payback time!” From the Muslims you hear, “We expect the flag of Islam to fly one day over the White House.”

Can U.S. Constitutional law work alongside Islamic Sharia Law? Answer: no! But that won’t stop Muslims from pushing their Sharia against American parliamentary procedure. Do women’s rights stand a chance under Sharia Law? No! But that won’t stop Muslims from working toward implementation! Can America accept ‘honor killings’, ‘stonings’, ‘arranged marriages’, ‘subjugation of women’ and other tribal rites of Islam? No! But we can expect more of it as their numbers grow.

One example of many: In New York, February 16, 2009, FOX News, Joshua Rhett Miller reported, “The estranged wife of a Muslim television executive feared for her life after filing for divorce last month from her abusive husband,” her attorney said — and was found beheaded Thursday in his upstate New York television studio. Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37, was found dead on Thursday at the offices of Bridges TV in Orchard Park, N.Y., near Buffalo. Her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, has reportedly been charged with second-degree murder. “She was very much aware of the potential ramification of her filing for divorce might have,” said attorney Elizabeth DiPirro, whose law firm represented Aasiya Hassan in the divorce proceeding. "But she wanted to proceed despite the potential for it to erupt."

Whether you call it multiculturalism or other names, it leads to chaos as suggested by Dr. Garrett Hardin and Dr. George Colburn.

Dr. George Colburn said, “It is insanity to add new cultures that promote disharmony within an existing peaceful culture.” www.tomorrowsamerica.com

“The United States is the only country in history that deliberately changed its ethnic makeup, and history has few examples of diversity creating a stable society,” said Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm. By 2045, America’s new majority will become Mexican/Hispanic.

Dr. Garrett Hardin's 'The Ostrich Factor' illustrates our folly as to turning our culture over to many cultures: “Multiculturalism presumes peaceful co-existence of many cultures within the boundaries of the same nation. Examples of multiculturalism from USSR, the Baltics, and Central Africa have resulted in violence generated by chaos.”

Hardin suggests the adoption of multiculturalism is based on a serious misunderstanding of culture. “The definition of culture by 19th century anthropologists: "the activities of a society - that is, of its members - constitute its culture" was intended to enlarge sympathy for daily rituals around the globe. The consequences of multiculturalism are much different when many cultures are placed within a single nation (intranational multiculturalism) rather than between nations (international multiculturalism).

The Full Article Continues Here